Kelly's organization corollary assumes which type of relationship among constructs?

The correct choice reflects that Kelly's organization corollary is based on an ordinal relationship among constructs. In his Personal Construct Theory, the organization corollary asserts that individuals arrange their personal constructs in a systematic way to make sense of their experiences. This involves a ranking or ordering of constructs, implying a relationship where some constructs are more significant or applicable in specific contexts than others.

This ordinal relationship allows individuals to utilize the most relevant constructs for a given situation, while still maintaining a structured system of meaning. For instance, if someone has constructs such as "friendly" and "unfriendly," the organization corollary suggests that they can prioritize using "friendly" when evaluating a specific interaction that they deem significant. This systematic arrangement helps in forecasting future events and interpreting past experiences, reinforcing the dynamic nature of personal constructs.

In contrast, other potential relationships such as cardinal or hierarchical do not accurately represent the fundamental way individuals organize their constructs according to Kelly's theory. A cardinal relationship would imply an absolute value or measurement of constructs, while a hierarchical structure would suggest a rigid, fixed ranking rather than a flexible ordering that can change based on context and relevance. A random relationship would imply no discernible order, which contradicts the idea of organized mental frameworks that stabilizes